Bloomberg Talks · · 13 min
PIMCO UK Senior Advisor Rupert Harrison Talks Budget
With Rupert Harrison
Summary
PIMCO UK senior advisor Rupert Harrison walks through the UK budget outlook, arguing the government faces a funding gap of roughly £20-25bn once rising defence spending (to 3% of GDP by 2030) and avoiding real-terms cuts to unproductive departments are included. He sees limited room to raise revenue without a large lever, leaving employer National Insurance or breaking manifesto pledges as the main options, and expects another fiscal event, possibly in spring. He is sceptical that welfare cuts will materialise given backbench resistance, while describing the bank tax (worth about £2-3bn and likely passed through to deposit and mortgage rates) as largely priced into bank shares. On politics, he puts an early election at about 25%, links Andy Burnham's conference speech to possible Labour-Lib Dem coalition groundwork, and says EU rejoining is not a question for this parliament. He concludes the budget itself should be smaller and market-friendly, but that the UK's pro-business narrative problem is hurting investment decisions.
Key takeaways
- Rupert Harrison on Europe's economy: The UK budget is much smaller than 2024-25 and should be absorbed smoothly by markets.
- Rupert Harrison on Europe's economy: UK spending pressures need roughly £20-25bn more, forcing another fiscal event next year, possibly in spring.
- Rupert Harrison on Europe's economy: UK tax base is near its limits; raising £20-25bn likely needs a big lever such as employer NI.
- Rupert Harrison on Banks: A well-trailed UK bank tax is already priced into bank shares, and its cost will pass to customers.
- Rupert Harrison on Europe's economy: Welfare costs are hard to cut; credible spending savings would surprise markets positively.
What was said, by company and theme
9 views from 1 speaker. Every quote is checked against the episode's transcript (how).
Europe's economy
Rupert Harrison · PIMCO
The UK budget is much smaller than 2024-25 and should be absorbed smoothly by markets.
The budget may meet short-term expectations because it is likely to be much smaller than the 2024 and 2025 budgets, which had very large tax rises and heavy pre-budget speculation. Moving parts are around £5bn up and down, against £20-plus billion before. Markets have largely absorbed this already, so Harrison expects a smooth ride for markets, though pressures building into next year raise questions.
“Well, it may meet short term expectations... it's gonna be a much smaller budget than 2024 and 2025, which had very, very large moving parts... sort of moving parts around the sort of 5,000,000,000 scale... that has been pretty well absorbed already by markets and I think should therefore be a pretty smooth ride for markets.”at 1:48
Rupert Harrison · PIMCO
UK spending pressures need roughly £20-25bn more, forcing another fiscal event next year, possibly in spring.
Defence spending rising to 3% of GDP by 2030 costs £10bn-plus on its own. Avoiding real-terms cuts to unproductive departments in 2027-29, as the IFS identifies, needs another £10-15bn. Together that is £20-25bn at least to make the spending review add up. The Treasury has pushed the spending review from spring into autumn, which Harrison reads as buying time. Revenue options keep shrinking, so he expects another fiscal event, possibly in spring, whether or not an election is called.
“So to get, for example, defense spending up to 3% of GDP by 2030... that is 10,000,000,000 plus on its own. ... you need probably 10 to 15,000,000,000 on top of that. So we're talking 20 to 25,000,000,000 at least to really make the spending review add up.”at 3:38
Rupert Harrison · PIMCO
UK tax base is near its limits; raising £20-25bn likely needs a big lever such as employer NI.
Capital gains and other mobile parts of the tax base are already taxed at high rates, so the OBR's modelling shows the UK is reaching the limits of what can be raised without fundamental reform. Raising £20-25bn needs one large lever, not many small taxes. That leaves either a return to employer National Insurance, or breaking manifesto pledges, which is very hard for politicians. Rachel Reeves already had to use employer NI in her first budget because it was the only large lever not ruled out.
“we are reaching the limits of what can be raised without much more fundamental reform. ... You can't do it with lots and lots of little taxes. So either you return back to employer national insurance”at 5:02
Rupert Harrison · PIMCO
UK policy's negative business narrative is hurting investment and location decisions; government wants to change it.
The government realises the narrative around business and wealth creation has been extremely negative. Investors pick this up around the world when judging UK policy direction, citing tax rises and labour-market regulation. Harrison says this is affecting investment and location decisions, which is why the government wants to change the narrative. He calls the weekend deregulation headlines small beer and classic pre-budget noise.
“the narrative around business and wealth creation has been extremely negative... they do realize that that is... having an impact on investment and location decisions”at 6:05
Rupert Harrison · PIMCO
Welfare costs are hard to cut; credible spending savings would surprise markets positively.
The government has found it very difficult to cut spending. The welfare bill is rising very fast, including working-age sickness and disability costs. Reeves and Kyle tried to address this but backed off under backbench pressure, and parliamentary dynamics limit the chancellor's control. Harrison says he is not holding his breath, but credible savings, on departments or more likely welfare, would be a big positive surprise and would address markets' doubts about fiscal slippage.
“The big difference is that this government has found it very difficult to cut spending. ... the welfare bill, which is rising very rapidly... So if the government could deliver some credible spending savings... I think that would be a big positive surprise for markets”at 7:49
European politics
Rupert Harrison · PIMCO
Rejoining the EU would trade economic gains for free movement and is not for this parliament.
Rejoining the EU raises the same political trade-offs debated since 2016. Any economic benefit would involve giving up some things on the other side, such as free movement, which Burnham appeared to raise as a possibility. Harrison says this is clearly not for this parliament, and even Burnham is framing it as one for the next parliament.
“the economic benefit that that could be claimed would involve giving away some things on the other side in terms of free movement... I think that clearly this is not something for this parliament.”at 9:34
Rupert Harrison · PIMCO
Burnham's post-election pledges look like groundwork for a Labour–Lib Dem coalition.
Andy Burnham's conference speech framed three big issues as post-election: electoral reform, social care reform (a priority of Ed Davey), and closer ties with the EU. Harrison says these are almost a love letter to the Liberal Democrats. He thinks the speech is preparing the ground for a possible Labour-Lib Dem coalition after an election, or as a fallback option. That in turn feeds investor interest in an early election.
“all of which are sort of almost like a love letter to the Liberal Democrats... it just feels a little bit like this is preparing the ground for a potential Labour Lib Dem coalition after an election or at least as a fallback option.”at 10:04
Rupert Harrison · PIMCO
UK early election is about 25% likely, most likely in May next year.
Harrison puts an early election at 25%, which he says is not his majority view but not impossible. Calling one right after the budget would be very unusual, since the government has just had good polling. Otherwise it would most likely come in May next year, as a fixed local-election cycle makes an off-cycle vote difficult. He sees the possibility as a reason investors are watching.
“Early election, 25%. ... That's certainly not my majority, but it's it's not impossible.”at 10:50
Banks
Rupert Harrison · PIMCO
A well-trailed UK bank tax is already priced into bank shares, and its cost will pass to customers.
The bank tax is a well-trailed measure that Harrison thinks is now largely priced into bank shares. Expectations are that hiking the rates back up raises about £2-3bn. That is the largest revenue item, outweighing the small capital gains and entrepreneurs-relief changes he expects. The tax is not costless: he expects it to pass through to deposit rates and mortgage rates.
“a pretty well trailed tax on the banks, that is now pretty much in the price, I think, for certainly bank shares ... That will get passed through, in terms of, you know, deposit rates and mortgage rates.”at 6:42
Topics
- UK Labour coalition prospects
- UK bank tax
- UK budget size and market reaction
- UK business sentiment and policy narrative
- UK early election
- UK rejoining EU
- UK spending review funding gap
- UK tax revenue limits
- UK welfare spending cuts
More from Bloomberg Talks
- Arora Group Founder Surinder Arora Talks UK's Business Outlook · October 30, 2026
- Earnings Special: Intel Plunges on PC Sales Slump & Amazon Slips · October 29, 2026
- Charles Schwab CEO Rick Wurster Talks Future of AI · October 29, 2026
- NEC Director Kevin Hassett Talks US Economy · October 29, 2026
- Cisco Systems President & Chief Product Officer Jeetu Patel Talks AI Industry · October 29, 2026
Ask your AI about this episode
Chorus gives Claude, ChatGPT and other assistants every view from this episode and the rest of the market's podcasts. Ask who agrees, who changed their mind, and what else was said about the same companies.
Chorus reports what speakers said. It isn't investment advice. How Chorus works · About Chorus